Client Case Studies
The Latitude Difference
Awards & Reviews
Advanced Administrator Training
Getting Started Guide
Technical and Training Resources
R & D
Enhancements In Development
User "Isn't" Search Operator
User Search "isn't" logic seems to be working as designed... however, as we discussed many times before, its usefulness is limited by the fact that this type of rule cannot be used with Operand "AND" logic.
1. When I search "Department Isn't [value]" I now get results, but users listed in Results don't fit the rule
2. Similarly, when I search "Role Isn't [Portal Administrator]" I get latadmin_PORTALCODE returned. That seems problematic... but what if Portal Admin also has Student Role?
So we searched "Role Isn't [Portal Administrator]" AND "Role Isn't [Student]" but still got same user.
Can we please consider one of two enhancement options? 1.) We hide the "isn't" comparison from all search criteria. 2.) We build logic that allows for successful "AND" pairing with other criteria. And also improve results with multiple profile/position/role setup.
Join the Discussion...
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail
Have an enhancement idea?
Receive enhancement updates via email